Legal Opinion

KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Boom Town Saloon, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 28, 2000No. 99 C 7710PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case arises out of a dispute concerning the closed-circuit telecast of a professional prizefight between Evander Ho-lyfield and Michael Moorer on November 8, 1997, and associated under-card and preliminary bouts. Plaintiff KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. (“KingVision”) claims that it had the exclusive rights to exhibit and distribute that telecast, and that defendants Boom Town Saloon, Inc. (“Boom Town”) and its owner/manager, Eugene Perry, violated those exclusive rights by willfully intercepting or receiving the signal…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Prostar v. MassachiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Entertainment by J & J, Inc. v. Al-Waha Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  4. McDonald v. Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. CSC Holdings, Inc. v. KrautDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API