Legal Opinion

H., R. McC. v. W., L. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1906No. Civ. No. 196PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Action to recover from the defendant rent for the use of certain personal property according to the terms of a lease thereof, amounting to the sum of $956.28. It is alleged in the complaint that on May 11, 1904, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into and executed a lease in writing of certain personal property (setting forth a copy thereof); that upon the execution of said lease the defendant, by virtue of its provisions, took possession of the property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kindred v. Second Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Frohreich v. GammonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Mitchell v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Swasey v. De L'EtancheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Pratt v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Johnson v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Watson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Schneider v. DanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API