Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Heath v. Uraga

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 2001No. 25440-9-IIPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

Nick and Lesley Uraga (Uraga)1 appeal from a partial summary judgment order to raze the home they built in violation of subdivision covenants. We affirm.

FACTS

I. Evolution of Subdivision Building Review Committee

The parties own separate lots in Miller’s Panorama Park Second Addition, a West Tacoma subdivision with western views of the Narrows. The subdivision developers recorded restrictive covenants in the 1960s. Paragraph five of the covenants (1) established a committee comprising three named members to review building plans for any lot in the subdivision (the Committee); and (2) provided…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Micro Enhancement v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Micro Enhancement International, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Sutton v. Tacoma School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API