Legal Opinion

In Re Fiddler's Woods Bondholders Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-2340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUONGO, Chief Judge.

This class action litigation arose from the default on $33.1 million in bonds issued to finance the construction of Fiddler’s Woods, a life-care facility for elderly Jewish residents of the Philadelphia area. Plaintiffs, bondholders of Fiddler’s Woods, have alleged that various participants 1 in the project violated the federal securities laws and the common law of Pennsylvania.

Defendants Blyth Eastman Paine Webber, Inc. and Herbert J. Sims & Co., Inc., lead underwriters of the bond issue, subsequently filed a third-party complaint against The Fidelity Bank, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. Tesch v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geier v. Hamer Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Continental Bank v. CatonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Tenorio v. CamachoNorthern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API