Legal Opinion

Tenorio v. Camacho

Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court

Decided December 10, 1987No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-488; CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-507Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FACTS

On November 2, 1987 this court ordered that the Third-Party Complaint of Bank of Saipan and Sid Blair against Tokai Bank of California for indemnity and contribution be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Defendants Bank of Saipan and Sid Blair now move for entry of final judgment with respect to the court's order dismissing Tokai Bank of California pursuant to Com.R.Civ.Pro., Rule 54(b).

*266MOTION CONSIDERED WITHOUT BEARING

Rule 54(b) does not prescribe any procedure for obtaining a certificate. Indeed, the court may consider whether to issue such certification sua sponte. Arimizu v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Third-Party v. H. Muehlstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party Ellio Rando v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. Arimizu v. Financial SEC. Ins. Co., Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. In Re Fiddler's Woods Bondholders LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API