Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Naiker v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 29, 2018No. Case No. C17-1740-RAJPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Richard A. Jones, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Kamal Krishan Naiker and Dipanjali Pillay seek review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") on Mr. Naiker's I-130 application. Dkt. # 1. Plaintiffs now move for summary judgment. Dkt. # 13. Defendants United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), responded, and also cross-moved for summary judgment. Dkt. # 14. The parties both filed replies to the competing motions. Dkt. ## 15, 16.

After considering the Administrative Record (Dkt. ## 8, 10)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Judulang v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AK v. GARLANDDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Erdal Bolukgiray v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. Nunoo v. BAUSMANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Nwankwere v. JaddouDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Parcha v. CuccinelliDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API