Legal Opinion

Judulang v. Holder

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 12, 2011No. 10-694PublishedCited by 362 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kagan

This case concerns the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA or Board) policy for deciding when resident aliens may apply to the Attorney General for relief from deportation under a now-repealed provision of the immigration laws. We hold that the BIA’s approach is arbitrary and capricious.

The legal background of this case is complex, but the prin­ciple guiding our decision is anything but. When an ad­ministrative agency sets policy, it must provide a reasoned explanation for its action. That is not a high bar, but it is an unwavering one. Here, the BIA has failed to meet it.

I

A

Federal immigration…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by362 opinions

  1. MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Vartelas v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. ACA Int'l v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Luna Torres v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018

357 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API