Legal Opinion
Erdal Bolukgiray v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 3, 2026No. 5:25-cv-09452Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ERDAL BOLUKGIRAY, Case No. 25-cv-09452-EKL 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS IN PART 10 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND Re: Dkt. No. 21 IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 This action arises out of a decision by Defendants United States Citizenship and 14 Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to 15 deny Plaintiff Erdal Bolukgiray’s Form I-730 refugee/asylee relative petition, which requested 16 derivative asylum status for his spouse.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.