Legal Opinion

State v. Bellman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1999No. 98-651PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

We decide here that the statutory requirement regarding the timing of the sexual predator hearing is not jurisdictional and a defendant may waive it. We also decide that a defendant who was sentenced for a sexually oriented offense, released prior to July 1, 1997, and not previously required to register *210under R.C. Chapter 2950, cannot be required to register as a sexual predator under R.C. 2950.04.

I. Sexual Predator Hearing

R.C. 2950.09(B)(1), part of Ohio’s sexual predator law, provides: “The judge shall conduct the [sexual predator] hearing prior to sentencing and, if the sexually oriented…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FarrarOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In re DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BarnellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Harrell v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. KirschOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Madsen v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Ragozine v. ShakerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. ChampionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API