Legal Opinion
Citizens for East Shore Parks v. State Lands Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 2011No. A129896PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BANKE, J.
Defendant and respondent State Lands Commission (Lands Commission) approved a 30-year lease allowing real party in interest and respondent Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (Chevron) to continue operating a marine *554terminal in San Francisco Bay waters, near the company’s refinery in Richmond, California. Plaintiffs and appellants Citizens for East Shore Parks and Daniel P. Doellstedt contend that in approving the lease, the Lands Commission failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) and also violated the public trust doctrine.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated ProceedingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Light v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.