Priem v. Shires
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
Marion Priem, joined by his wife, sued Paul L. Shires for money damages. Shires, in turn, sued the Priems by way of counterclaim. After a jury trial, the trial court disregarded the jury’s answers to special issues and rendered judgment that the parties take nothing by their respective suits. We will affirm the trial-court judgment. We will refer to the Priems as “Priem” and to Shires by name.
Priem alleged that Shires had failed to complete in a good and workmanlike manner his construction of Priem’s residence. Contending that such failure amounted to the “breach of an ...…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Ferguson-McKinney Dry Goods Co. v. GarrettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- State v. Tyler County State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Alexander v. HandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Barcus v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Honeycutt v. Billingsley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Kerrville HRH, Inc. v. City of Kerrville, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- Albert J. Taggi & Ann D. Taggi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Bath Junkie Franchise, Inc. v. Hygiene, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
- Fulcrum Central v. AutoTester, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.