Legal Opinion
Barcus v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 13, 1917No. 1208. [fn*]PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* Second petition for rehearing denied November 14, 1917.
On Motion to Strike Out Statement of Facts.
The statement of facts is a part of the record made by the district court, and motions affecting such record and to make it speak the truth should be properly filed in that court. Boggess v. Harris, 90 Tex. 476,39 S.W. 561; Ennis Mercantile Co. v. Wathen, 93 Tex. 622, 57 S.W. 946; Harris v. Stark, 101 Tex. 587, 110 S.W. 737; Willis v. Smith, 90 Tex. 635,40 S.W. 401; Neville v. Miller, 171 S.W. 1109.
If prior to the submission of this case the appellee indicates a desire to have its submission…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ennis Mercantile Co. v. WathenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- P. J. Willis & Bro. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Neville v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Harris v. StarkTexas Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by26 opinions
- Priem v. ShiresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Oklahoma Tool & Supply Co. v. DanielsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Cosey v. Supreme Camp of American WoodmenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Dameris v. Homestead BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.