Legal Opinion

Holst v. Butler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1954No. Appeal, No. 331PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The appeal is from a decree of a court of common pleas directing an accounting by two partners, directing payment of sums of money found to be due and ordering reassignment of certain patents. The complaint in equity was filed by two of the partners, plaintiffs. The answer and defense of the remaining two partners, the defendants, was that the transaction was illegal because three of the partners were officers and employes of the United States Government and the partnership was rendering service to contractors who were dealing, and had contracts, with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. DIPPEL v. BrunozziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Tucker v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Goldberg v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Deibler v. The Chas. H. Elliott Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Med-Mar, Inc. v. DILWORTHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Cooper v. Saunders-HuntDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Roxy Auto Co. v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API