Legal Opinion

DIPPEL v. Brunozzi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1950No. Appeal, 220PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

Plaintiffs brought action to recover the balance of the purchase money alleged to be due on the sale to defendant of two Lorain shovels and a tractor. The complaint set forth an oral agreement between the parties that the purchase price of these three articles should be $33,000, and that, in addition, defendant should pay the cost of transportation and insurance, which amounted to $949.03, or a total of $33,949.03, on account of which defendant had paid $20,213.15, leaving a balance due of $13,735.88. Defendant filed an answer in which he admitted the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kimble v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Duff v. KeenanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Kissell v. Motor Age Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. Cunard Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Pittsburg v. GoshornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Development Finance Corporation the National Housing and Health Care Trust, Inc. v. Alpha Housing & Health Care, Inc. v. John Sower Wilbur Dove, Third Party Sylvan Associates, Inc., ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Davis v. Pennzoil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. American Ass'n of Meat Processors v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Nursing Home Consultants, Inc. v. Quantum Health Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
  5. Bollinger v. Palmerton Area Communities Endeavor, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API