Legal Opinion

Onondaga Nation v. Thacher

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to recover the possession of four wampum belts obtained by defendant through intermediate transfers from an Onondaga Indian.

1Opinion of the CourtHiscook, J.

The object of this action in brief is to have it adjudicated that the Indian League of Five Nations composed of the Onondagas, Oneidas, Mohawks, Senecas and Cayugas, and afterwards made Six Nations by the addition of the Tuscaroras, used wampum belts to commemorate important events; that these belts by an association of ideas 'with them served the purpose of a history; that there was an official of the league known as wampum keeper whose duty it was to preserve the wampums, and upon proper occasions to expound their meaning and signification; that the Onondaga Indian from whom defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gillet v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Seneca Nation of Indians v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. McKinnon v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Strong v. WatermanNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
  5. Hovey v. BromleyNew York Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morse v. PenzimerNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Glick v. BeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Sutton v. DuntleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Kinderhill Select Bloodstock, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API