Legal Opinion

Kinderhill Select Bloodstock, Inc. v. United States

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided October 29, 1993No. 93-CV-1314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

On August 17, 1993, agents of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) seized four thoroughbred horses allegedly owned by the plaintiffs as a levy for back taxes owed by the Kinderhill Investment Company, Inc. (“Kinderhill Investment”). Three of the horses currently go by the names of M.J. Bean, Señorita Constanza, and Malicious (formerly Hardly Risen), and the fourth horse is an unnamed filly. Plaintiffs allege that Kinderhill Investment has no interest in these horses with the possible exception of M.J. Bean. Plaintiff Constance Moss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Staff v. HemingwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Chabert v. Robert & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Giordano v. Grand Prix Sales, Service, Restoration Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Onondaga Nation v. ThacherNew York Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. NPF Racing Stables, LLC v. AguirreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. United States v. New England Greens, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API