Legal Opinion

Hovey v. Bromley

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Erie county. Action by Theroh Hovey against Charles Bromley for conversion. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made on the minutes, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court to • . recover damages for the alleged wrongful conversion by the defendant of a mule, the property of the plaintiff. The answer was a general denial. Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $60 in the justice’s court. An appeal was taken from the judgment to the county court of Erie county, where the case was retried. The court charged the jury that the only question for them to determine was the value of the mule. To this ruling the defendant duly excepted. The jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff for $55 damages.

There was evidence tending to show…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pease v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Parker v. MiddlebrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
  3. Plano Manufacturing Co v. Northern Pacific Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Rissing v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Onondaga Nation v. ThacherNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ernest Ochs v. PohlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Hoff v. CoumeightNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API