Legal Opinion

Glick v. Beer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

The complaint demands the specific performance of an agreement to sell certain Bulgarian tobacco. The justification in the complaint for the relief of specific performance is:

“ Third. Upon information and belief, that the aforementioned Bulgarian tobacco which defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff, was imported by the defendant into the United States from Bulgaria, and that said Bulgarian tobacco is a distinctive type of tobacco and is of unique quality and character, and, on account of the war, it is impossible for plaintiff to obtain said Bulgarian tobacco elsewhere.”

Section 149 of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waddle v. . CabanaNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Spears v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Butler v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Bloomingdale v. BloomingdaleNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Scruggs v. CotterillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morse v. PenzimerNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cohen v. Rosenstock Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Giordano v. Grand Prix Sales, Service, Restoration Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Anderson v. PerminterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Trustees of Columbia University v. Mortgagee Investors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API