Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Steel McHy. Co v. Crockett, Secy. of State
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1928No. 4629PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
There are eight causes of action alleged in the complaint. Plaintiff and its assignors are foreign corporations doing business within the state of Utah. The object of the action is to recover from the secretary of state certain fees paid to that officer as annual license fees for the privilege of doing business within the state. It is averred in the first cause of action that plaintiff is a Minnesota corporation; that it has an authorized capital stock of $6,000,000; that stock has been issued, and is now outstanding, representing $4,-948,800, and that the latter named amount is its total…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Frick Et Al. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Baltic Mining Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North Tintic Mining Co. v. Crockett, Secy. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- First Security Corp. of Ogden v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936