Legal Opinion

North Tintic Mining Co. v. Crockett, Secy. of State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1929No. 4821PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff brought this action in the district court of Salt Lake county pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act passed by the Legislature of Utah 1925. Laws Utah 1925, c. 24, p. 40. The defendant filed a general demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was overruled. Upon the defendant refusing to answer or further plead judgment was rendered declaring that section 1271, Laws of Utah 1925, c. 112, is violative of and contrary to the provisions of section 6, art. 12, of the Constitution of Utah, and therefore void as applied to domestic corporations. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Cella Commission Co. v. BohlingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Badger v. Crockett, Secretary of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Minneapolis Steel McHy. Co v. Crockett, Secy. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. McFarland v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. In re KeslerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API