Sanchez v. Carruth
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Does procedural due process, under the circumstances of this case, require that petitioner be afforded an opportunity for a hearing prior to garnishment of his wages, based upon a prior judgment establishing his obligation to pay child support? That is the question presented in this special action. The respondent court decided this question adversely to petitioner and we agree with its ruling. Although we find no basis for appellate intervention, since it appears that the question is plaguing both bench and bar and is frequently arising, we consider it appropriate to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adair v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Jarvis v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Ediger v. EdigerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Ibach v. IbachArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Huggins v. DeinhardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Ibach v. IbachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980