Legal Opinion
Mangold v. Neuman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 10, 1952No. Appeal, 196PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,
The appeal is from a judgment of a court of common pleas sustaining preliminary objections to a complaint in trespass.
By Ms will Harry Publicker, decedent, made testamentary provisions for Ms daughter Helen, his daughter Elva and his son Robert, and for their respective issue. Bequests to his daughter Elva P. Mangold and her issue, plaintiffs? were revoked by codicil. The will and the codicils were probated and no appeal has been taken from the register’s decree of probate. The plaintiffs, being thus disinherited, instituted an action in trespass against…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Woodruff v. TaylorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
- Szmahl's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Sebik's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- West, Admrx. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cardenas v. SchoberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Robert Golden, Attorney-In-Fact for Leah Golden Donald Earwood, of the Estate of Helen Earwood v. David S. Golden Darlene KoposkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Cole v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Charles Shaid of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. George Hyman Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- McNeil v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.