Legal Opinion
Charles Shaid of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. George Hyman Construction Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1996No. Civil Action 92-3654PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
This is a diversity case under Pennsylvania law. Plaintiff Charles Shaid of Pennsylvania, Inc. (“Shaid”), is a commercial painting sub contractor. Defendant the George Hyman Construction Co. (“Hyman”), is a commercial general contractor. Shaid and Hyman entered into- a contract pursuant to which Shaid, as a subcontractor, was to perform painting work for Hyman, as a general contractor, at 30th Street Station in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In the complaint, Shaid alleged that Hyman had not paid certain of the sums due Shaid for work it performed…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies", ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) in No. 95-3432. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriters's at Lloyd's of London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as "Jackson and Companies." ( Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) Koppers Company, Inc., in No. 95-3461Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- D'ERRICO v. DeFazioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Collier Ex Rel. Collier v. William Penn School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Schwartz v. Abex Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Allied Fire & Safety Equipment Co. v. Dick Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.