Legal Opinion

Szmahl's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1939No. Appeal, 247PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

The alleged will of John Szmahl having been probated, an appeal was taken to the orphans’ court on the ground that the signature was forged. Contestants petitioned for a trial by jury to determine whether decedent affixed his signature to the document and whether the writing was the last will of decedent. An answer was filed by proponents and the case came on for hearing before the orphans’ court. Proponents offered in evidence the probate of the will. This was objected to, but the objection was overruled. Proponents then rested. Contestants, without offering any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sebik's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Keen's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. West, Admrx. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Plotts' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Sholly v. DillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Lennox v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Commonwealth v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Ash WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Quein WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API