United States v. Parada-Molina
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM1
Francisco Antonio Parada-Molina plead guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The district court imposed a sixteen point offense level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 (commission of an aggravated felony prior to reentry). Parada-Molina appeals the sentencing enhancement because he contends that his prior offense, possession of narcotic drugs, was not an aggravated felony. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
Parada-Molina’s prior offense constitutes an aggravated felony if Arizona law denominates the offense a felony. See *738Uni…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Ernesto Ibarra-GalindoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Goddard v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Champlin v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999