Legal Opinion

United States v. Parada-Molina

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 19, 2001No. 00-10173Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM1

Francisco Antonio Parada-Molina plead guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). The district court imposed a sixteen point offense level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 (commission of an aggravated felony prior to reentry). Parada-Molina appeals the sentencing enhancement because he contends that his prior offense, possession of narcotic drugs, was not an aggravated felony. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Parada-Molina’s prior offense constitutes an aggravated felony if Arizona law denominates the offense a felony. See *738Uni…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. United States v. Ernesto Ibarra-GalindoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Goddard v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Champlin v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API