F. P. Cutting Co. v. Peterson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was to recover for the unpaid part of the purchase price of some thousands of cases of canned tomatoes sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. The court instructed the jury to render its verdict for the plaintiff in the amount sued for. This the jury did and from the order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
Plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of canning fruits and vegetables. Defendant is a wholesale grocer. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract for the sale and delivery of canned tomatoes. These canned tomatoes were…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Getty v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Essington v. BucheleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- Dorn v. GoetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Bank of America v. GrangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.