Legal Opinion

Lizzo v. Drukas

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 9, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is a bill in equity for a mandatory injunction compelling the defendants to remove fill alleged to have been placed on a way over which the plaintiffs had a right of passage. The judge made findings of material facts and ordered the entry of a decree that the defendants pay to the plaintiffs the sum of $200. From a decree entered accordingly the plaintiffs appealed. The evidence is not reported.

The plaintiffs challenge the decree solely because of the relief granted. They contend that they were entitled to a mandatory injunction ordering the removal of the fill instead of an award of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Geragosian v. Union Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Ferrone v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Westhampton Reservoir Recreation Corp. v. HodderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Blood v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gilpin v. Jacob Ellis Realties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Crowley v. J. C. Ryan Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  3. Metropolitan District Commission v. PlotnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Gilpin v. Jacob Ellis Realties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Cohen v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API