Metropolitan District Commission v. Plotnick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
The plaintiff contends that the final decree in the Superior Court fails to afford adequate relief *2for the defendants’ interference with a pipeline easement. The easement was taken for the Commonwealth on December 29, 1938, through land then owned by the city of Boston and The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. The land is now owned by . the defendant Plotnick and is occupied for a used car lot by the defendant Lee Motors, Inc. The plaintiff laid a 36 inch pipeline in the easement which is used as a water main. After the pipe was laid the fill over the top of the pipe was from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Geragosian v. Union Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Blood v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Lizzo v. DrukasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Town of Marblehead v. DeeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969