Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Beal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1945PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

By this bill in equity the plaintiff seeks a mandatory injunction ordering the defendant Beal (hereinafter called the defendant)1 to remove from his building a fire escape which, it is alleged, extends over the land of the plaintiff; she also asks to have the defendant’s building removed to the extent that it encroaches upon a passageway adjoining her land on the ground that it interferes with her “rights of free and unobstructed use of air, light, and passage.” From a final decree dismissing the bill and granting certain relief to the defendant on his counterclaim the plaintiff appeals.

The…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Lynch v. Union Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Fox v. Union Sugar RefineryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Geragosian v. Union Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Ottavia v. SavareseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Boucher v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Myers v. SalinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Peters v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API