Legal Opinion

Rice v. Taylor

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1934No. Docket No. S.F. 14580PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This appeal presents the single question as to whether plaintiff Rice or defendant Pacific Bond and Mortgage Company has the prior lien upon a residence lot, and improvements thereon, at 101 Cambridge Avenue, San Leandro, California. Admittedly defendant Taylor was indebted to both these parties and was the record owner of said lot.

O'n October 15, 1925, an encumbrance of some $4,000 existed on said property in favor of the Mercantile Trust Company, a banking corporation. On said date Taylor, who was a real estate broker and presumably versed, by both experience and observation, in the art of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wittenbrock v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Cady v. PurserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Cooke v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Aronoff v. Lenkin Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Gregg v. CloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API