Legal Opinion
Youngblood v. Incorporated Town of Wewoka
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 17, 1923No. 13849PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, J,
This was an action by M. S. Youngblood et al. to enjoin the town of Wewoka, through its officials, from entering into a contract for a water works system. The court denied the injunction and plaintiffs below appealed to this court. In the meantime, there being' no superse-deas bond, the contract sought to be enjoined has been let and ratified by the citizens of Wewoka.
On June 20, 1923, defendants in error filed motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground :
First. -That the question presented by this appeal has now become a moot question.
Second. That the act sought to be enjoined in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Page v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Doctors' Oil Co. v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Teter v. Board of Ed. of City of DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Drummond v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Atkins v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goldsmith v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Maxwell v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Roper v. Board of Ed., City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Chizek v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Skouby v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 60Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.