Legal Opinion

Doctors' Oil Co. v. Adair

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1921No. 11662PublishedCited by 8 opinions

■ Error from District Court, Greer Oounty. •'Action by J . J. Adair and Lula V. Adair against Doctors’ Oil Company, to cancel oil iéase. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

Defendants in error have filed their motion to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that the legal issues in-vplved in such appeal have become moot questions only.

It appears that this action was filed in the district court of Greer county by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in "error to cancel an oil and gas lease on the lands of the defendants in error, which léáse by its terms expired on May 3, 1921, and as no practical relief can be granted by a decision at this time, the case becomes Mooted, and will be regarded as abstract and hypothetical, and will be dismissed.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parrish v. School Dist. No. 19Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Killough v. Ft. Supply Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Thomason, Co. Treas. v. Board of Com'rs of DelawareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. Incorporated Town of WewokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Teter v. Board of Ed. of City of DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Drummond v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Skouby v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 60Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Edmondson v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API