Hyder v. Weilbaecher
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Plaintiffs’ assignments of error relate solely to exceptions taken to several portions of the trial court’s instructions to the jury. As the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable to the facts of the case and critical to an understanding of the alleged errors in the jury charge, we will first review the law in this area.. , A surgeon is not ordinarily an insurer of the success of his operation, and in malpractice actions there is generally no presumption of negligence in the failure to successfully effect a remedy. Starnes v. Taylor, 272 N.C. 386, 158 S.E. 2d 339…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Starnes v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Johnson v. Ely. No. 4Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Pendergraft v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tice v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Clark v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Grigg v. LesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Tice v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.