Baranofsky v. Weiss

Opinion bx

Rhodes, J.,

The plaintiff brought an action of replevin for certain fixtures leased to the defendant. The court below, sitting without a jury, found for the plaintiff, subject to the condition that she pay the defendant the sum of $551.25, for which the defendant was held to have had an equitable lien upon the chattels in question. The court subsequently amended its finding, and entered judgment in favor of defendant in the sum of $551.25. From this judgment, the plaintiff appeals to this court.

The plaintiff, Rose Baranofsky, and her husband, Harry Baranofsky, on March 4,1932, made a…