Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1982No. 115PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This action for defamation was brought by appellee, a sergeant in the Philadelphia Police Department, against appellant, publisher of The Philadelphia Inquirer. It is based on an article in the Inquirer concerning police corruption. The jury awarded appellee both compensatory and punitive damages. Appellant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. or new trial was denied. We have concluded that judgment n. o. v. should have been entered because appellee failed to prove that appellant published the article with “actual malice” or “reckless disregard of the truth,” as required by New *478York…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Time, Inc. v. FirestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Steven Graboff v. Colleran FirmCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Larsen v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API