Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Sedgwick County

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 11, 2004No. 91,097PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.:

Sedgwick County (County) appeals the decision of the Workers Compensation Appeals Board (Board) affirming the administrative law judge’s conclusion that the County is not entitled to an offset for social security retirement benefits pursuant to K.S.A. 44-501(h).

Willie McIntosh worked as a security officer for Sedgwick County. In the spring of 1999, at about the time of his 65th birthday, McIntosh began receiving social security retirement benefits of $973 per month; but he continued to work full-time for the County. He planned to retire effective August 1, 1999. However, in June…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Injured Workers of Kansas v. FranklinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Baker v. List and Clark Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Brown v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  4. Boyd v. Barton Transfer & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  5. Gadberry v. R. L. Polk & Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Robinson v. City of Wichita Employees' Retirement Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. McIntosh v. Sedgwick CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Farley v. Above Par TransportationCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. McIntosh v. Sedgwick CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API