Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Sedgwick County

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 9, 2005No. 93,762PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

This case concerns the calculation of workers compensation benefits for a permanent total disability when there has been an offset for retirement benefits under K.S.A. 44-501(h). Willie McIntosh appeals the decision of the Workers Compensation Board (Board) which not only reduced his weekly workers compensation amount by his applicable weekly retirement benefits but also reduced the $125,000 statutory cap on an employer’s liability for permanent total disability benefits under K.S.A. 44-510f(a)(l). This award effectively limited the number of weeks that McIntosh could receive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Oshman Sporting Goods Co. KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Robinett v. the Haskell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Foos v. Terminix & Zurich America InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. GordonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. Sedgwick CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Lleras v. Via Christi Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  3. Douglas v. Ad Astra Information Systems, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  4. Payne v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. Douglas v. Ad Astra Information Systems, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API