Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Sedgwick County

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 2006No. 93,762PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Claimant was awarded workers compensation for total permanent disability because of an injury while employed as a security officer with Sedgwick County (the County). The Kansas Workers Compensation Board (the Board) correctly reduced his weekly benefits by the amount of other retirement benefits under the offset provisions under K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 44-501(h). However, the Board, in an effort not to eliminate the offset provisions, reduced his permanent and total disability award below the $125,000 statutory cap provided by law. The Kansas Court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. In Re Marriage of RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. State v. AdeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Oshman Sporting Goods Co. KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. MarxSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. SchowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. Moser v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUESupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Barbury v. Duckwall Alco Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  5. American General Financial Services, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API