San Francisco Mercantile Union v. Muller
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant.
Plaintiff sued on a promissory note executed by defendant to one Jacob Gorfinkel and by him assigned to plaintiff.
Defendant admitted the execution of the note, denied the assignment to plaintiff, and pleaded that there was no.consideration for the note. The court found in favor of plaintiff as to the assignment, but found that defendant received no consideration for the execution and delivery of said note, and for that reason gave judgment for defendant.
It is. insisted by appellant that the evidence does not support the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- de Racouillat v. SansevainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- California Steam Navigation Co. v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Swem v. GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- McCreary v. MarstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Witmer Bros. v. WeidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Poggetto v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Ambrose v. Hammond Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Italo Petroleum Corp. v. ShingleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937