Witmer Bros. v. Weid
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action on two promissory notes made by defendant to James McLoughlin, each for five hundred dollars, with interest after maturity at rate of one per cent per month, and assigned by McLoughlin to plaintiff.
The judgment was in favor of plaintiff for the full amount of principal and interest of both notes. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
*572The notes were made to secure payment of defendant’s subscription of one thousand dollars, to be paid to McLoughlin in consideration of the construction of a proposed street railroad on a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- McLaughlin v. ClausenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- San Francisco Mercantile Union v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Daniels v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Southard v. TornelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Jost v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913