Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Morse v. . Walker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 4, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1ConcurrenceDevin, J.
SEAWELL and ERVIN, JJ., join in concurring opinion. Civil action for recovery of damages alleged to have been sustained by the respective plaintiffs as a result of the negligence of the defendant in the operation of his automobile in which the plaintiffs were passengers.
The three actions were consolidated for trial by consent of all parties.
The plaintiffs allege in their respective complaints, that Harold Morse, acting for himself and the other members of his family, contracted with the defendant to transport the plaintiffs from Winston-Salem, N.C. to Elizabeth, N. J., and that it was agreed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Kruy v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Miller v. FairleyOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Doss Ex Rel. Doss v. SewellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Kizer v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Crow v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Woolf v. HoltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.