Miller v. City of Louisville

MILLIICEN, Judge.

The constitutionality of our urban renewal and urban development statutes, KRS Chapter 99, is at stake here.

As stated in the City’s brief, “The meat of the case is around the bone of urban redevelopment and urban renewal — whether these are proper objectives of government, whether tax moneys may be spent for them, whether the power of eminent domain may be brought to bear in furtherance of them, and whether the statutes attempt improper delegation of legislative power.”

This case specifically presents the question of the validity of the City of Louisville’s $5,000,000 “Voted…