Legal Opinion

Steenberg v. Town of Oakfield

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1992No. 90-1032PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

William Steenberg (Steenberg) seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals. Steenberg argues that he met his burden of proving that his recent purchase of farmland was an arm's-length transaction and that it was error for the Town of Oakfield Board of Review to uphold their tax assessor's valuation in excess of the sede price. The court of appeals concluded that the Town of Oakfield, in determining the assessment, acted appropriately in disregarding the price Steenberg paid for the land. Two issues are presented. The first issue is whether Steenberg met his burden of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rosen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Darcel, Inc. v. City of Manitowoc Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Geipel v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State ex rel. Evansville Mercantile Ass'n v. City of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Metropolitan Holding Co. v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. ABKA Ltd. Partnership v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. St. Ex Rel. Levine v. Fox Point Review Bd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gray v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API