Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Geipel v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1975No. 333PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The basic issue is whether the assessor’s method of valuation was proper under the facts of this case.

The scope of review by certiorari is strictly limited in Wisconsin. As stated in State v. Goulette (1974), 65 Wis. 2d 207, 215, 222 N. W. 2d 622, the reviewing court may consider only:. . (1) Whether the board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it acted according to law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ball v. McPheeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Kaczkowski v. Fire & Police CommissionersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. GouletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Markarian v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Wasilewski v. Board of School Directors of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Ltd. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Darcel, Inc. v. City of Manitowoc Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. ABKA Ltd. Partnership v. Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API