Legal Opinion

Gray v. Wyoming State Board of Equalization

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1995No. 94-19PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

At issue in this case is the right of a taxpayer, Jan Charles Gray (Gray), to have his real property appraised at its purchase price by the county assessor for purposes of the ad valorem, tax. The County Assessor (Assessor), using a formula calculation, the Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA), arrived at assessed valuations that were much higher than Gray’s purchase prices. The assessed valuation actually used, however, was set by reducing the preceding year’s valuation by twenty-five percent pursuant to 1988 Wyo.Sess.Laws ch. 73, § 3. 1 Gray appealed these valuations to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization, Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Airtouch Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. RT Communications, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Campbell CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Qwest Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API