Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Kendall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1894No. 16,396PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellee sued the appellant for personal injuries, and with the general verdict in his favor for five thousand dollars, the jury returned answers to special interrogatories from which it appears that the general verdict was necessarily found upon the first of the two paragraphs of complaint. Upon the assignment of error the appellant questions the sufficiency of each of the paragraphs of complaint, but, as it thus appears that the recovery was upon the first paragraph, the appellant did not suffer from the ruling upon the second paragraph, and, in the absence of such finding the fact is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Jeffersonville Railroad v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Citizens Street Railroad v. JollyIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Barrett v. SippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RichardsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API