Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Fidelity Inv. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1932No. 21373PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFNER,. J,

This is an action in replev-in brought in the common pleas court of Tulsa county by Fidelity Investment Company,- a corporation, against James R. and IVla O. Murphy, to recover a cpiantity of household furniture. Plaintiff claimed a lien thereon by virtue of a chattel mortgage to secure a note for $815, executed by defendants. Defendants answered by way of a general denial and also pleaded usury; and by way of counterclaim sought to recover the suim of $250, because of alleged usury reserved and charged by plaintiff; and tendered plaintiff the sum of $327, which amount, together…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Porter v. RottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Elson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Vose v. U.S. Cities CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marquess v. SpanerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Davis v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Sheldon v. DealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API