Legal Opinion

Caribbean Const. Corp. v. Kennedy Van Saun Mfg. & Eng. Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 18, 1952PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This motion challenges the propriety of plaintiff’s notice to take defendant’s deposition where the requirement of Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., that the summons be forthwith delivered for service upon the defendant, was violated.

It may be noted at the outset that what really is involved as between the litigants is the race for priority in the taking of depositions before trial. We need not consider whether the advantages in priority are illusory or real. It is enough to observe that numerous motions are presented at each motion term…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bomar v. KeyesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Kenealy v. Texas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. Caldwell-Clements, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. Grauer v. Schenley Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  5. Morrison Export Co. v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  2. Waters v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. School Committee v. DupreyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Garza v. Webb CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  5. In re the Royal BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API