Space Mark, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
This case arises from a solicitation issued by the Air Force for a Communications and Information Management contract at Los Angeles Air Force Base. The solicitation was part of a two step process aimed at determining whether the services described in the solicitation could be performed more economically by a private contractor when compared to the costs of the Air Force’s in-house personnel performing the same work.1 In this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (1994 & Supp. III 1997), plaintiff, Space Mark, Inc. (“SMI”), the contractor that won the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Southfork Systems, Inc. v. The United States, and State of Texas, Acting Through the Texas Commission for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Guy Spezzaferro v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Labat-Anderson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hallmark-Phoenix 3, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Vero Technical Support, Inc. v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010