Legal Opinion
Hallmark-Phoenix 3, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 24, 2011No. 11-98CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge:
“[CJourts are not charged with general guardianship against all potential mischief in the complicated tasks of government.” 2
In this bid protest action, Hallmark-Phoenix 3, LLC (Hallmark or plaintiff) challenges the Ar Force’s decision to use its own civilian employees to supply services previously performed by Hallmark. Plaintiff asserts that this decision was not made in accordance with two federal statutes, sections 129a and 2463(a) of Title 10 of the U.S.Code, as well as Department of Defense guidance issued thereunder. Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Dellew Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Elmendorf Support Services Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- International Genomics Consortium v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.